Improving the Legal Ways of Fighting Corruption: An Analysis on the Example of the Anti-Corruption Expertise of the Law “On the Prosecution Service of the Russian Federation” and in the Context of the Corruption Perception Index

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2017, Vol. 3. №1

Title: 
Improving the Legal Ways of Fighting Corruption: An Analysis on the Example of the Anti-Corruption Expertise of the Law “On the Prosecution Service of the Russian Federation” and in the Context of the Corruption Perception Index


For citation: Teplyakov D. O., Izhbulaeva A. N. 2017. “Improving the Legal Ways of Fighting Corruption: An Analysis on the Example of the Anti-Corruption Expertise of the Law ‘On the Prosecution Service of the Russian Federation’ and in the Context of the Corruption Perception Index”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 3, no 1, pp. 149-160. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2017-3-1-149-160

About the authors:

Dmitry O. Teplyakov, Cand. Sci. (Jur.), Associate Professor, Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law, Institute of State and Law, Tyumen State University; tepld@yandex.ru

Alsu N. Izhbulaeva, Master Student, Institute of State and Law, Tyumen State University; alsu_tmn@bk.ru

Abstract:

The authors analyze the Federal Law “On the Prosecution Service of the Russian Federation” and conclude that it contains a significant number of corruption-generating factors, including the breadth of discretionary powers. The Prosecutor’s Office is the main body of anti-corruption expertise and it adopts mandatory requirement to change the corruption of the law. The authors draw attention to the fact that the Prosecution acts on the basis of a law that contains corruption factors. The prevalence of corruption in the public sector, no strict certainty in the laws governing the activities of state bodies resulted in the fact that in the international index of corruption perception in 2016 Russia took place 119, the same as Azerbaijan and Guyana. The authors propose to put the Federal law “On the Prosecution Service of the Russian Federation” through and independent anti-corruption expert examination with the purpose of making changes and eliminating the corruption potential of the law.

References:

  1. Elektronnyy fond pravovoy i normativno-tekhnicheskoy dokumentatsii [Electronic Fund Legal and Normative-Technical Documentation]. “Konventsiya o grazhdansko-pravovoy otvetstvennosti za korruptsiyu ETS no 174” [Convention on Civil Liability for Corruption ETS no 174]. http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901858911
  2. Federal Law of December 25, 2008 no 273-FZ as of July 3, 2016 “O protivodeystvie korruptsii” [On the Fight against Corruption]. Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, 2008, no 53 (part 1), art. 6228.
  3. Federal Law of January 17, 1992 no 2202-1 as July 3, 2016 “O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [On the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation]. Vemosti S"ezda narodnykh deputatov Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Verkhovnogo Soveta Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 1992, no 8, art. 366.
  4. Federal Law of July 17, 2009 no 172-FZ as of October 21, 2013 “Ob antikorruptsionnoy ekspertize normativnykh pravovykh aktov i proektov normativnykh pravovykh aktov” [On the Anti-Corruption Expertise of Legal Acts and Normative Legal Acts]. Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, 2009, no 29, art. 3609.
  5. Federal Law of March 8, 2015 no 21-FZ as of July 3, 2016 “Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [The Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation]. Rossiyskaya gazeta, 2015, no 49.
  6. Federal Law of November 14, 2002 no 138-FZ as of November 19, 2016 “Grazhdanskiy protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [The Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Rossiyskaya gazeta, 2002, no 220.
  7. Federal Law of October 6, 1999 no 184-FZ as July 3, 2016 “Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) i ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti sub"ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [On General Principles of Organization of Legislative (Representative) and Executive Bodies of State Power of Subjects of the Russian Federation]. Rossiyskaya gazeta, 1999, no 206.
  8. Federal Law of October 6, 2003 no 131-FZ as of July 3, 2016 “Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [On General Principles of Organization of Local Government in the Russian Federation]. Rossiyskaya gazeta, 2003, no 202.
  9. Galimov A. G. 2013. “Rol' prokurorskogo nadzora v obespechenii zakonnosti normativnykh pravovykh aktov regional'nogo parlamenta” [The Role of the Prosecutor’s Supervision to Ensure the Legality of Normative Legal Acts of the Regional Parliament]. VEPS, no 2, pp. 125-129.
  10. Government Decree of 26 February 2010 no 96 as of July 18, 2015 “Ob antikorruptsionnoy ekspertize normativnykh pravovykh aktov i proektov normativnykh pravovykh aktov” [On the Anti-Corruption Expertise of Legal Acts and Normative Legal Acts]. Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, 2010, no 10, art. 1084.
  11. Kochura V. N. 2012. “Antikorruptsionnaya ekspertiza: metodika provedeniya” [Anti-Corruption Expertise: Methodology]. Journal of Russian Law, no 9(189), pp. 65-70.
  12. Korotkova O. A. 2014. “Organy prokuratury kak sub"ekt antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy normativnykh aktov” [The Prosecuting Authorities as the Subject of Anti-Corruption Expertise Regulations]. Vestnik TGU, no 7 (135), pp. 122-126.
  13. Kulikov M. Yu. 2010. “Pravovye problemy antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy” [Legal Problems of Anti-Corruption Expertise]. Actual Problems of Economics and Law, no 4(16), pp. 96-98.
  14. Lomov A. M. 2009. “Antikorruptsionnyy potentsial zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii v sfere protivodeystviya korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby” [Anti-Corruption Potential of the Russian Federation in the Sphere of Combating Corruption in the Public Service]. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, no 21, pp. 85-90.
  15. Meleshko O. A. 2012. “Ob"ekt i predmet antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy” [The Object and Subject of Anti-corruption Expertise]. Herald of Omsk University. Series “Law”, no 1(30), pp. 155-163.
  16. Nechevin D. K. 2013. “Rol' organov prokuratury pri provedenii antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy normativnykh pravovykh aktov” [The Role of Prosecutors in Conducting Anti-Corruption Expertise of Normative Legal Acts]. Izvestija Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, no 4-2, pp. 93-96.
  17. Norets A. M. 2015. “K problemam provedeniya antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy prokuraturoy Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [The Problems of Anti-Corruption Expertise of the Russian Federation Prosecutor's Office]. Humanities, Social-Economic and Social Sciences, no 6-1, pp. 372-374.
  18. Poyda E. S. 2014. “Tendentsii i perspektivy pravovogo regulirovaniya prokurorskogo nadzora v RF” [Trends and Perspectives of Legal Regulation of Public Prosecutor's Supervision in the Russian Federation]. Osnovy ekonomiki, upravleniya i biznessa, no 3(15), pp. 83-85.
  19. President of the RF Decree “O natsional'nom plane protivodeystviya korruptsii na 2016-2017 gody” [On the National Anti-Corruption Plan for 2016-2017]. Elektronnyy fond pravovoy normativno-tekhnicheskoy dokumentatsii. http://docs.cntd.ru/document/420345711
  20. Shesler A. V. 2013. “Vidy antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy” [Types of Anti-Corruption Expertise]. Tomsk State University Journal, no 375, pp. 119-121.
  21. Transperensi interneshnl Rossiya: tsentr Antikorruptsionnykh issledovaniy i initsiativ [Transparency International Russia: Centre Anti-Corruption Research and Initiative]. “Indeks Vospriyatiya korruptsii – 2015” [Corruption Perceptions Index 2015]. http://www.transparency.org/cpi2015
  22. Vasilchikova N. A. 2012. “Mery reagirovaniya prokurora na vyyavlennye v normativnykh pravovykh aktakh korruptsiogennye faktory” [Responding to the Prosecutor Identified in Normative Legal Acts Corruption-Factors]. Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg University of MIA of Russia, no 1, pp. 104-107.
  23. Voroninа Yu. I. 2012. “Antikorruptsionnaya ekspertiza normativnykh pravovykh aktov kak sredstvo protivodeystviya korruptsii v sovremennoy Rossii: teoretiko-pravovoy aspekt” [Anti-Corruption Expertise of Normative Legal Acts as a Means of Combating Corruption in Modern Russia: Theoretical and Legal Aspect]. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, no 3, pp. 74-79.