Supranational parliamentarianism — mechanisms to improve community interaction

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


2016, Vol. 2. №1

Supranational parliamentarianism — mechanisms to improve community interaction

About the author:

Stepan M. Kirichuk, Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Professor at the Tyumen State Oil and Gas University, Chairman of the State Certification Commission in State and Municipal Management program, the Major in Parliamentary Activity and Ensuring Parliamentary Cooperation, Institute of Public Administration and Management, The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA) (Moscow);


The article analyzes the role of lawmakers and opportunities in the development of the state using the example of the supranational parliament of the Union State of Belarus and Russia. The author considers the representative agencies of state power as an institution for coordinating the public interest in the discussion and decision-making, defining rules and standards of citizens and their associations activity. The article illustrates the main stages of the formation of the Union State of Belarus and Russia, the work of the Union Parliamentary Assembly, and the complexity of Russian-Belarusian interstate establishment.


  1. Babichev I. V. and Shugrina E. S. (2015), Kommentariy k Federalnomu zakonu “Ob obschih principah organizacii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federacii” [Commentary to the Federal Law “On General Principles of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation”], Moscow (in Russian).
  2. Bakushev V. V. (2012), Parlamentarizm. Vvodnyy kurs [Parliamentarism. Introductory Course], Moscow (in Russian).
  3. Bakushev V. V. and Likhachev V. N. (2015), Parlamentarizm. Obespechenie zakonodatelnyh (predstavitelnyh) organov vlasti [Parliamentarism. Ensuring Legislative (Representative) Authorities], Moscow (in Russian).
  4. Bakushev V. V. and Khazin A. L. (2008), Elektronnyy municipalitet: na puti razvitiya [Electronic municipality. Development], Moscow (in Russian).
  5. Gontmakher E. Sh., Zagladin N. V. and Semenenko I. S. (2014), Etnosociokulturnyy konflikt: novaya realnost sovremennogo mira [Sociocultural Ethnic Conflict. New Realities of the Modern World], Moscow (in Russian).
  6. Gritcenko E. V., Markvart E. and Mokhov V. P. (2014), Mestnoe samoupravlenie i razvitie territoriy: rossiyskiy i evropeyskiy opyt [Local Governance and Territorial Development. Russian and European Experience], Perm (in Russian).
  7. Kirichuk S. M. (2008), Upravlenie municipalnym obrazovaniem [Municipality Management], St. Petersburg (in Russian).
  8. Kirichuk S. M. (2014), “V EAES ″otverzhennyh″ ne budet” [There Will be no “outcasts” in EEU], Soyuznoe gosudarstvo [Union State], no 8-9 (in Russian).
  9. Pervyy Forum regionov Belarusi i Rossii [The First Forum of Belarus and Russian Regions] (2014), Vestnik Soveta Federacii [Federation Council Herald], no 7-8 (in Russian).