Revisiting the issue of tort liabilities in labour law

About the author:

Oksana A. Kursova, Cand. Sci. (Jur.), Associate Professor, Department of Labor Law and Entrepreneurship, University of Tyumen; o.a.kursova@utmn.ru; ORCID: 0000-0001-9170-1678

Abstract:

This article discusses some of the features reception interdisciplinary branches of law and related analogy of civil and labor law. In particular, it presents the possibility of using the conceptual and categorical apparatus of the labor law concept of “tort liability”. The author proves the thesis about the limited application of this concept in the framework of labor law by some “borderline” cases, the legal regulation which can not be pure attributed only to the scope of the labor law. Next, the article examines the cases where possible or subsidiary application of the rules of civil law on the obligations of the injury, or the use of similar standards of the Institute of Civil Law in the presence of a gap in the labor legislation and cases of unjustified from the point of view of the author, the use of the design of tort liability in relation to commitments arising from the employment relationship between the employee and the employer. The author formulates a conclusion that in cases of inter-branch reception omissionship industry should be carried out within the limits outlined basic legal categories of the branch of the right recipient.

References:

1.         Vasin V. N., Kazancev V. I. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Obshhaja chast’. Osobennaja chast’ [Civil Law. General Part. Special Part. With Comments and Case Studies] / M. Ja. Shiminova (ed.). Moscow: Knizhnyj mir, 2007. 786 p. (In Russian)

2.         Golovina S. Ju. Ponjatijnyj apparat trudovogo prava [The Conceptual Framework of Employment and Labour Law]. Thesis Synopsis. Ekaterinburg, 1998. P. 51. (In Russian)

3.         Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii: Chasti pervaja, vtoraja, tret’ja [Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Parts I, II, II, IV]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Official Gazette of the Russian Federation]. 1994. No 32. Article 3301; Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Official Gazette of the Russian Federation]. 1996. No 5. Article 410; Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Official Gazette of the Russian Federation]. 2001. No 49. Article 4552. (In Russian)

4.         Grazhdanskij processual’nyj kodeks RF ot 14 nojabrja 2002 g. № 138-FZ (GPK RF) [Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation No 138-FZ of November 14, 2002]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Official Gazette of the Russian Federation]. 2002. No 46. Article 4532. (In Russian)

5.         Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil Law: manual] / A. P. Sergeev, Ju. K. Tolstoj (eds.). Part I. Moscow: Prospekt, 1997. 784 p. (In Russian)

6.         Kudinov O. A. Rimskoe pravo [Roman Law]. Moscow: Ekzamen, 2007. 638 p. (In Russian)

7.         Kursova O. A.Ispol’zovanie pravovoj recepcii v processe formirovanija juridicheskoj konstrukcii dogovora v trudovom prave: problemy teorii i praktiki [The Use of Legal Reception in the Process of Legal Construction of a Contract in Labor Law: Theory and Practice Problems]. Vestnik tjumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tyumen State University Herald Law]. 2008. No 2. Pp. 132-38. (In Russian)

8.         Lushnikova M. V., Lushnikov A. M. Ocherki teorii trudovogo prava [Essays on the Theory of Employment and Labour Law]. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij centr, 2006. 938 p.

(In Russian)

9.         Federal’nyj zakon ot 29.07.2004 № 98-FZ “O kommercheskoj tajne [Federal Law of the Russian Federation No 98-FZ ‘On Commercial Secrets’ of July 29, 2004]”. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Official Gazette of the Russian Federation]. No 32. Article 3283. (In Russian)

10.     Tihomirova L. V., Tihomirov M. Ju. Juridicheskaja enciklopedija [Legal Encyclopedia] /

M. Ju. Tihomirov (ed.). Moscow: Jurinformcentr, 1997. 525 p. (In Russian)