Presentation of some rules of court rulings

About the authors:

Natalia N. Gerasimova, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law and Process, Institute of state and law of Tyumen state University, Federal Judge in Retirement; nngerasimova@yandex.ru

Tatiana A. Panfilova,

Abstract:

Procedural documents have always been the result of a focused, conscious documentation of the objective reality phenomena in the language of words aimed at a reliable transfer of this information in space and time. Provided a judge conducts the proceeding correctly at all stages, states the facts clearly and legally sound, both parties will be satisfied with the results. Moreover, knowledgeable and grammatically correct procedural documents, competently phrased pleas, clearly stated court decisions are also of great importance. Administration of justice in civil cases is mostly implemented in the form of judicial decisions on behalf of the Russian Federation. Being drafted and stated correctly, well- motivated and documented, the decision will contribute to supremacy of law, enhance the authority of the judiciary. A judgment without a convincing answer on the merits of a civil dispute, stated illiterately and carelessly, brings discredit on the judge, hearing the case and the judicial power at large.

References:

1. Biulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF — The Bulletin of the RF Supreme Court. 2004. № 2.

(in Russian).

2. Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii — Legislation Bulletin of the Russian Federation. 2002. № 46. P. 4532. (in Russian).

3. Zaitsev, I.M. The court's decision as a service document. Vestnik SGAP — Vestnik SGAP. 1995. № 2. Pp. 15-17. (in Russian).

4. Biulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF — The Bulletin of the RF Supreme Court. 2004. № 2.

(in Russian).

5. Treushnikov, M.K. Grazhdanskii protsess [Civil litigation] / Ed. by M.K. Treushnikov. Мoscow, 2007. P. 783. (in Russian).

6. Vasilenko, S. Using a computer should facilitate the work of judges. Rossiiskaia iustitsiia — The Russian justice. 2003. № 3. P. 11-13. (in Russian).

7. Rabchuk, V.N. Protsessual'naia dokumentatsiia: Ucheb.-metod. Posobie [The procedural documentation: study guide]. Rostov-na-Donu, 2008. 379 p. (in Russian).

8. Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii — The Collection of Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation. 2002. № 46. P. 4532. (in Russian).

9. Rabchuk, V.N. Protsessual'naia dokumentatsiia: Ucheb.-metod. Posobie [The procedural documentation: study guide]. Rostov-na-Donu, 2008. P. 379. (in Russian).

10. Vasilenko, S. Using a computer should facilitate the work of judges. Rossiiskaia iustitsiia — The Russian justice. 2003. № 3. P. 11-13. (in Russian).