Efficiency of Deratization Actions at Regulation of Populations House Mouse (Mus Musculus)

Tyumen State University Herald. Natural Resource Use and Ecology


Release:

2016, Vol. 2. №3

Title: 
Efficiency of Deratization Actions at Regulation of Populations House Mouse (Mus Musculus)


About the authors:

Sergey N. Gashev, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Professor, Head of the Department of Zoology and Evolutionary Ecology of Animals, University of Tyumen; gsn-61@mail.ru

Irina A. Matveeva, 4th Year Student, Institute of Biology, Tyumen State University; serengetty@mail.ru

Tatyana G. Sivachenko, 4th Year Student, Institute of Biology, Tyumen State University; sivtan@newmail.ru

Abstract:

The article considers the problems of deratization efficiency at regulation of house mouse populations in various premises of the city of Tyumen. The results of the conducted research show that deratization leads rather to increase of rodents by 1.4 times. Under the influence of anthropogenous aspects (firstly, toxic ones) and due to sanitary and epidemiologic processing of premises with rodenticides, the house mice inhabiting the derated premises are inhibited. Their morphological and physiological indicators (absolute and relative body weight, heart index, liver index, index of kidneys, index of adrenal glands, spleen index) are changing. These changes confirm increasing metabolism, energy metabolism, and general organism stress. There are insignificant distinctions in sexual structure of micropopulations of the house mice inhabiting derated and non-derated premises: the amount of females and young animals increases after deratization. In the derated premises, the reproductive success is decreasing by 1.4 times. Thus, deratization efficiency is low due to the inflow of animals from adjacent territories which worsens the general sanitary and epidemiologic situation in the premises.

References:

  1. Gashev S. N. 1991. “Vliyanie neftyanogo zagryazneniya na faunu i ekologiyu melkih mlekopitayuschih Srednego Priobya” [The Impact of Oil Pollution on the Fauna and Ecology of Small Mammals in Middle Ob]. Cand. Sci. (Biol.) diss. abstract. Sverdlovsk: IPAE Ural Branch of the USSR AS. 
  2. Gashev S. N. 1998. “Ispolzovanie ekologicheskih i morfofiziologicheskih pokazateley pozvonochnyh zhivotnyh dlya ocenki sostoyaniya okruzhayuschey prirodnoy sredy” [Using Ecological and Morphological-physiological Indices of Vertebrate Animals to Evaluate the Environment State]. Otchet o nauchnoy i nauchno-organizacionnoy deyatelnosti za 1997 g. Tyumen: IPOS SB RAS. 
  3. Gashev S. N. 2000. Mlekopitayuschie v sisteme ekologicheskogo monitoringa na primere Tyumenskoy oblasti [Mammals in the System of Environmental Monitoring (the Case Study of Tyumen Region)]. Tyumen: Tyumen State University. 
  4. Gashev S. N., Sivachenko T. G. 2005. “Ekologiya domovoy myshi v usloviyah periodicheskoy deratizacii” [Ecology of House Mouse in the Conditions of Periodic Disinfestation]. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Fundamental and Applied Ecology: Urbanization Problems”. Yekaterinburg: Ural State University.
  5. Gashev S. N., Zhygileva O. N., Sazonova N. A., et al. 2006. Zooindikatory v sisteme regionalnogo ekologicheskogo monitoringa Tyumenskoy oblasti: Metodika ispolzovaniya [Zoo Indicators in the System of Tyumen Region Environmental Monitoring: Technique of Use]. Tyumen: Tyumen State University. 
  6. Kipaykin V. A. 2003. Dezinfektologiya [Disinfectology]. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix. 
  7. Krasnov B. R., Shylova S. A. 1990. “Domovaya mysh kak faktor, prepyatstvuyuschiy zaseleniyu stroeniy drugimi vidami gryzunov” [House Mouse as the Factor Preventing Colonization of Buildings by Other Types of Rodents]. Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists. Biological Series, pp. 30-37. 
  8. Kucheruk V. V. 1988. “Gryzuny — obitateli postroek cheloveka i naselyonnyh punktov razlichnyh regionov SSSR” [Rodents — Inhabitants of Human Settlements of Various Regions of the USSR]. In: Voronov A. (ed.). 1988. Obschaya i regionalnaya teriogeographiya. Voprosy teriologii, pp. 165-237. Moscow: Nauka. 
  9. Linsey A. V. 1989. “Response of the White-Footed to the Transition between Disturbed and Undisturbed Habitats”. Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 67, no 2, pp. 505-512. DOI: 10.1139/z89-073
  10. Polyakov I. Ya. 1968. Myshevidnye gryzuny i mery borby s nimi [Rodents and Their Control]. Leningrad: Selkhozgiz. 
  11. Schwartz S. S. 1967. Ekologicheskie osnovy adaptacii zhivotnyh [Ecological Bases of Animals’ Adaptation]. Moscow: Nauka. 
  12. Schwartz S. S., Smirnov V. S., Dobrinsky L. N. 1968. Metod morfofiziologicheskih indikatorov v ekologii nazemnyh pozvonochnyh [The Method of Morphological and Physiological Indicators in Ecology of Land Vertebrata]. Sverdlovsk: UFAN USSR. 
  13. Sokolov V. Ye. (ed.) 1989. Domovaya mysh [House Mouse]. Moscow: IEMEZH USSR.