Effect of Ganges River Morphological Dynamics and Farakka Barrage on Upward Migration and Catch of Indian Shad (Tenualosa Ilisha) in Bangladesh

Tyumen State University Herald. Natural Resource Use and Ecology


Release:

2016, Vol. 2. №3

Title: 
Effect of Ganges River Morphological Dynamics and Farakka Barrage on Upward Migration and Catch of Indian Shad (Tenualosa Ilisha) in Bangladesh


About the authors:

Hasan Faruque, MSc in Fisheries, Assistant Professor, Department of Fisheries, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh; hasanfaruque28@du.ac.bd

Dewan A. Ahsan, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Fisheries, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh; dah@sam.sdu.dk

Maminul H. Sarker, PhD, Deputy Executive Director, CEGIS, Dhaka, Bangladesh Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Services; msarker@cegisbd.com

Elena F. Gladun, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Administrative and Finance Law, Tyumen State University; efgladun@yandex.ru

Abstract:

Tenualosa ilisha, the largest and single most valuable fishery, considered as the flag-ship species of Bangladesh, also commonly known as Indian Shad in South-East-Asia, is now becoming a threatened species due to human intervention and climatic factors. This study is aimed to assess the impact of the Farakka barrage and the Ganges River morphological dynamics on the Indian shad migration and catch in Bangladesh. Results have indicated that the average water level of the river Ganges during the breeding season of Hilsa has significantly decreased over time. This situation is even worse in some particular points like Satbaria of the Pabna district, Dadpur and Kalyanpur of the Kushtia district, Ruppur and Samadia of the Rajshahi district, where the water level (6.5-8 m) is much lower than the threshold (10 m). The findings of the study have also revealed that the Ganges River is very much dynamic because of the changes in width of the river, and the shifting of river bends is quite frequent over the period of time and is more diverse in the upstream region than downstream. The decreased water level and the frequent shifting of the river bends might force the Hilsa fish to restrict their migration towards the upper Ganges. As a result, CPUE (catch per unit effort) of Hilsa in the Ganges River has significantly decreased (about 50 kg boat-1 day-1 in 1960s to about 1.0 kg boat-1 day-1 in 2012), and in some areas there is almost zero catch.

References:

  1. Adel M. M. 1999. “Microlevel Climate Change due to Change in Surface Features in the Ganges Delta”. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, vol. 53, pp. 83-93.
  2. Agostinho, A.A., Pelicice F. M., Gomesm L. C. 2008. Dams and the Fish Fauna of the Neotropical Region: Impacts and Management Related to Diversity and Fisheries. Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol. 68, pp. 1119-1132. DOI: 10.1590/S1519-69842008000500019
  3. Ahsan D. A., Bhattacharya S. B., Bhaumik U., Hazra S., Naser M. N. 2014. Migration, Spawning Patterns and Conservation of Hilsa Shad in Bangladesh and India. Bangladesh: IUCN.
  4. Ali M. Y. 1991. Towards sustainable development: Fisheries resources of Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: IUCN, Ministry of Environment and Forest, National Conservation Strategy of Bangladesh. Bangladesh: Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council.
  5. Banglapedia. 2014. Ganges-Padma River System. Accessed May 22, 2016. http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Ganges-Padma_River_System
  6. Baran E., Myschowoda C. 2009. “Dams and Fisheries in the Mekong Basin”. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, vol. 12, pp. 227-234. DOI: 10.1080/14634980903149902
  7. Baran E., Zalinge N., Ngor P. B., Baird I. G., Coates D. 2001. Fish Resource and Hydrobiological Modelling Approaches in the Mekong Basin. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: ICLARM, Penang, Malaysia and the Mekong River Commission Secretariat.
  8. Barlow C., Baran E., Halls A., Kshatriya M. 2008. “How Much of the Mekong Fish Catch is at Risk from Mainstream Dam Development?” Catch and Culture, vol. 14, pp. 16-21.
  9. BBS. 1991. Report of the Upazila Development Monitoring Project 1990, vol. II, June, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  10. Berga L., Buil J. M., Bofill E., De Cea J. C., Garcia Perez J. A., Gabriel M., Polimon J., Soriano A., Yague J. 2006. “Dams and Reservoirs, Societies and Environment in the 21st Century”. Two Volume Set: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Dams in the Societies of the 21st Century, 22nd International Congress on Large Dams (ICOLD), Barcelona, Spain.
  11. Bhaumik U. 2010. “Status of Fishery of Indian Shad, (Tenualosa Ilisha) with Reference to the Hooghly River System”. Proceedings of the 21st All India Congress of Zoology, pp. 66-81.
  12. Bhaumik U., Sharma A. P. 2012. “Present Status of Hilsa in Hooghly-Bhagirathi River”. CIFRI Bulletin no 179. Barrackpore, India.
  13. Brice J. C. 1964. Channel Patterns and Terraces of the Loup Rivers in Nebraska. Geological Survey Professional Paper 422-D. Washington: United States Government Printing Office.
  14. CEGIS. 2003. Ganges River: Morphological Evolution and Prediction. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Services.
  15. Chowdhury M. S. M., Khan G., Nishat A., Rahman R., Amin R. 2005. Assessment of the Minimum Environmental Flow in Bakkhali River, Cox’s Bazar. IUCN/UNEP Report, no 2.
  16. Coad B. 1997. “Shad in Iranian Waters”. Shad Journal, vol. 2, pp. 4-8.
  17. Dandekar P. 2012. “Damaged Rivers, Collapsing Fisheries: Impacts of Dams on Riverine Fisheries in India”. South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People. Accessed March 27, 2015. http://sandrp.in/dams/Impacts_of_Dams_on_Riverine_Fisheries_in_India_ParineetaDandekar_Sept2012.pdf
  18. Degerman E., Hammar J., Nyberg P., Svardson G. 2001. “Human Impact on the Fish Diversity in the Four Largest Lakes of Sweden”. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, vol. 30, pp. 522-528. DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-30.8.522
  19. EGIS. 1997. “An Introduction to the Use of Geographical Information Systems and Remote Sensing in Fisheries Monitoring”. EGIS Publication, vol. 1, pp. 181-182.
  20. Ferguson J. W., Healey M., Dugan P., Barlow C. 2011. “Potential Effects of Dams on Migratory Fish in the Mekong River: Lessons from Salmon in the Fraser and Columbia Rivers”. Environmental Management, vol. 47, pp. 141-159. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9563-6
  21. Fernandes R., Agostinho A. A., Ferreira E. A., Pavanelli C. S., Suzuki H. I., Lima D. P., Gomes L. C. 2009. “Effects of the Hydrological Regime on the Ichthyofauna of Riverine Environments of the Upper Paraná River Floodplain”. Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol. 69, pp. 669-680. DOI: 10.1590/S1519-69842009000300021
  22. Friend P. F., Sinha R. 1993. “Braiding and Meandering Parameters”. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, vol. 75, pp. 105-111. DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1993.075.01.05
  23. FRSS. 2013. Fisheries Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh. Bangladesh: Fisheries Resources Survey System (FRSS), Department of Fisheries.
  24. Ghosh S., Mistri B. 2012. “Hydrogeomorphic Significance of Sinuosity Index in Relation to River Instability: A Case Study of Damodar River, West Bengal, India”. International Journal of Advances in Earth Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 49-57.
  25. Halder G. C. 2004. “Present Status of the Hilsa Fishery in Bangladesh”. Completion Report of the Studies Conducted under the ARDMCS, GEF Component; FFP. Report no 38.8. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Department of Fisheries.
  26. Haroon Y. 1998. “Hilsa Shad: Fish for the Teeming Millions, New Management Alternatives Needed for the Hilsa Young”. Shad Journal, vol. 3, pp. 7-10.
  27. Islam M. N. 2006. Braiding morphodynamics of the Brahmaputra-jamuna River. Dhaka, Bangladesh: AH Development.
  28. Jackson D., Marmulla G. 2001. “The Influence of Dams on River Fisheries”. In: Marmulla G. (ed.). 2001. Dams, Fish and Fisheries: Opportunities, Challenges and Conflict Resolution. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper no 419, pp. 1-44. Rome.
  29. Kummu, M., Sarkkula J. 2008. “Impact of the Mekong River Flow Alteration on the Tonle Sap Flood Pulse”. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, vol. 37, pp. 185-192. DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[185:IOTMRF]2.0.CO;2
  30. Lejon A. G., Renofalt B. M., Nilsson C. 2009. “Conflicts Associated with Dam Removal in Sweden”. Ecology and Society, no 14, p. 4. DOI: 10.5751/ES-02931-140204
  31. Marmulla, G. 2001. “Dams, Fish and Fisheries: Opportunities, Challenges and Conflict Resolution”. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, no 419. Rome.
  32. Mirza M. M. Q. 1997. “Hydrological Changes in the Ganges System in Bangladesh in the Post-Farakka Period”. Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 42, pp. 613-631. DOI: 10.1080/02626669709492062
  33. Mohammed E. Y. (ed.). 2013. “Incentive-Based Hilsa Fish Conservation and Management in Bangladesh: Prospects and Challenges”. Workshop Report, March 24-25, IIED, London.
  34. Mome M. A. 2007. The Potential of the Artisanal Hilsa Fishery in Bangladesh: An Economically Efficient Fisheries Policy. Reykjavik, Iceland: United Nations University.
  35. Nanson G. C., Knighton A. D. 1996. “Anabranching Rivers: Their Cause, Character and Classification”. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, vol. 21, pp. 217-239. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199603)21:3<217::AID-ESP611>3.0.CO;2-U
  36. Nath A. K., Banerjee B. 2013. “Studies on the Status of Hilsa Catches in Hooghly-Estuarine System of West Bengal”. Fishing Chimes, vol. 33, pp. 46-51.
  37. Schumm S. A. 1963. The Fluvial System, vol. 338. N. Y.: John Wiley and Sons.
  38. Southwell T., Prashad B. 1918. “On Hilsa Investigations in Bengal, Bihar and Orissa”. Bulletin of Department of Fisheries Bengal vol. 1, pp. 11-12.
  39. Stanley E. H., Doyle M. W. 2003. “Trading Off: The Ecological Effects of Dam Removal”. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 1, pp. 15-22. DOI: 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0015:TOTEEO]2.0.CO;2
  40. Williams J. G. 2008. “Mitigating the Effects of High-Head Dams on the Columbia River, USA: Experience from the Trenches”. Hydrobiologia, vol. 609, pp. 241-251. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-008-9411-3
  41. Workman J. 2001. “Dams and Development a New Framework for Decision-Making”. Civil Engineering, vol. 144, pp. 8-9.
  42. WWF. 2004. Rivers at Risk: Dams and the Future of Freshwater Ecosystems. Accessed May 20, 2016. http://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?13716/Rivers-at-Risk-Dams-and-the-future-of- freshwater-ecosystems
  43. Xie S., Li Z., Liu J., Xie S., Wang H., Murphy B. R. 2007. “Fisheries of the Yangtze River Show Immediate Impacts of the Three Gorges Dam”. Fisheries, vol. 32, pp. 343-344.
  44. Yeasmin A., Islam M. N. 2011. “Changing Trends of Channel Pattern of the Ganges-Padma River”. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, vol. 2, pp. 669-675.
  45. Zigler S. J., Dewey M. R., Knights B. C., Runstrom A. L., Steingraeber M. T. 2004. “Hydrologic and Hydraulic Factors Affecting Passage of Paddlefish through Dams in the Upper Mississippi River”. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, vol. 133, pp. 160-172. DOI: 10.1577/T02-161