Bioindication Edaphotops Technogenic Dumps by Studying the Life of Lumbricus Terrestris

Tyumen State University Herald. Natural Resource Use and Ecology


Release:

2016, Vol. 2. №2

Title: 
Bioindication Edaphotops Technogenic Dumps by Studying the Life of Lumbricus Terrestris


About the author:

Vasyliy V. Popovych, Dr. Sci. (Tech.), Professor, Department of Ecological Safety, Lviv State University of Life Safety (Ukraine); popovich2007@ukr.net

Abstract:

One of the most common bio-indicators of environmental conditions for edaphotopes are earthworms. During the process of their bioindication with the help of earthworms, it is common to use such criteria, as the number of individuals, survival rate, the degree of damage to the external surfaces, and the intensity of metabolism. In some studies of the technologically contaminated edaphotopes such criteria, as speed earthworm burrowing into the soil, are used.

Physico-chemical and mechanical properties of edaphotopes from landfills may differ drastically in various areas. The main reason for this phenomenon is violation of the rules of landfills operation, uneven coating (or the absence) of bulk soil, chaotic abstraction, and leachate accumulation.

The aim of this work was the bioindication of technogenic landfills edaphotopes using earthworm activity.

The vital activity of earthworms is observed on the northern slope of the exposures that suggests the formation of the only positive here edaphope-climatopic conditions for the flora development.

References:

  1. Antoshchenkov V. F., Vasilevskiy M. I., Nasekina L. F. 1980. “Dozhdevye chervi v lugovykh pochvakh kak pokazateli rezhima ispolzovaniya pastbishch” [Earthworms in Grassland Soils as a Usage Mode Indicators for Pastures]. Ekologiya, no 3, pp. 77-82.
  2. Gaponov D. A. 2011. “Vyyavlenie i otsenka geofizicheskimi metodami lokalnogo tekhnogennogo zagryazneniya geologicheskoy sredy v mestakh razmeshcheniya otkhodov proizvodstva i potrebleniya” [Identification and Evaluation of Geophysical Methods of Local Man-Made Pollution of the Geological Environment in the Placements of Waste Production and Consumption]. Cand, Sci. (Geol-Min.) diss. abstract. Rostov-na-Donu.
  3. Gilyarov M. S. 1975. “Uchet krupnykh pochvennykh bespozvonochnykh (mezofauny)” [Accounting for Large Soil Invertebrates (Mesofauna)]. In: Gilyarov M. S. (ed.). 1975. Metody pochvenno-zoologicheskikh issledovaniy, pp. 12-29. Moscow: Nauka.
  4. Kibardin V. M., Zherebtsov A. K. 1990. “Vliyanie neftyanogo zagryazneniya na dozhdevykh chervey” [The Influence of Oil Pollution on Earthworms]. Proceedings of the 6th Research Conference for Young Scientists of Kazan Institute of Biology, pp. 230-232.
  5. Krivolutskiy D. A., Semyashkina T. M., Mikhaltsova Z. A., Turchaninova V. A. 1980. “Dozhdevye chervi kak bioindikator radioaktivnogo zagryazneniya pochvy” [Earthworms as a Bioindicator of Radioactive Contamination of the Soil]. Ekologiya, no 6, pp. 67-72.
  6. Kucheryavyy V. A. 2010. Obshchaya ekologiya [General Ecology]. Lvov: Mir.
  7. Kuzmin Ye. V. 2008. “Skorost zakapyvaniya i vyzhivaemost dozhdevykh chervey v usloviyakh neftyanogo zagryazneniya razlichnoy intensivnosti” [Burying Speed and Survival of Earthworms in Terms of Oil Pollution of Varying Intensity]. Proceedings of the 4th Research Conference “Aktualnye problemy ekologii Yaroslavskoy oblasti”, no 4, part 1, pp. 297-301. Yaroslavl: Izdanie VVO REA.
  8. Likhachev S. V. 2010. “Bioindikatsiya ekologicheskikh usloviy agromikrolandshafta s pomoshchyu pochvennykh chervey” [Bioindication of Environmental Conditions for Agricultural Micro-Landscape Using Soil Worms]. Proceedings of the Research Conference “Nauchnoe obespechenie innovatsionnogo razvitiya APK” (Izhevsk, February 16-19). In 4 vols, vol. 1, pp. 245-247. Izhevsk: Izhevskaya GSKhA.
  9. Lyubomirova V. N. 2013. “Kompleksnaya otsenka ekologicheskoy opasnosti nesanktsionirovannykh svalok tverdykh bytovykh otkhodov v selskikh rayonakh Ulyanovskoy oblasti” [Integrated Assessment of Ecological Danger of Unauthorized Dumps of Solid Household Waste in Rural Areas of the Ulyanovsk Region]. Cand. Sci. (Biol.) diss. abstract. Ulyanovsk.
  10. Perel T. S. 1976. “Kriticheskiy analiz sistemy Lumbricidae (s opredelitelnoy tablitsey rodov fauny SSSR)” [Critical Analysis Lumbricidae System (with the Key to Genera of the USSR Fauna)]. Russian Journal of Zoology, no 6(36), pp. 823-836.
  11. Petrov V. S. 1946. “Aktivnaya reaktsiya pochvy (rN) kak faktor rasprostraneniya dozhdevykh chervey (Lumbricidae, Oligocheta)” [Active Soil Reaction (Ph) as a Factor in the Spread of Worms (Lumbricidae, Oligocheta)]. Russian Journal of Zoology, no 2(25), pp. 107-110.
  12. Soromotin A. V. 1995. “Vliyanie neftyanogo zagryazneniya na pochvennykh bespozvonochnykh (mezofauny) v taezhnykh lesakh Srednego Priobya” [Influence of Oil Pollution on Soil Invertebrates (Mesofauna) In the Boreal Forests of the Middle Ob]. Sibirskiy Ekologicheskiy.